Institute for Marriage and Public Policy.
Post Office Box 1231 • Manassas, VA 20108 • (202) 216-9430 • Email: info@imapp.org


WWW iMAPP

Support iMAPP

Join the Institute for Marriage and Public Policy mailing list
Email:
Weekly Archives

Blogger!



Sunday, August 01, 2004

NAME THAT MARRIAGE (cont'd): David Blankenhorn

I've been thinking about the problem of what adjective to put in front of marriage, if we assume that some adjective is preferable to "traditional" and also, alas, necessary in order to suggest the heterosexual nature of marriage as an institution. Well, my candidate is conjugal. I know, I know -- it's an obscure, academic-sounding word. But it has the advantage of being accurate. Conjugal basically means of or relating to the married couple and their offspring and family. In other words, it suggests not merely the close relationship between the spouses, but also the bridging of the sex divide and the procreativity that comes with it.

Will "conjugal" focus group well? No. But it's the best word I can come up with. (Thanks to Dan Cere for first suggesting it.) But I'd still rather stay away from adjectives, period.

link

Share on Facebook! Tweet This! http://www.wikio.com VOTE

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

home | marriagedebate.com | resources | about imapp | contact

Copyright Institute for Marriage and Public Policy