Institute for Marriage and Public Policy.
Post Office Box 1231 • Manassas, VA 20108 • (202) 216-9430 • Email: info@imapp.org


WWW iMAPP

Support iMAPP

Join the Institute for Marriage and Public Policy mailing list
Email:
Weekly Archives

Blogger!



Wednesday, August 04, 2004

UTAH SUIT CHALLENGES LAWS ON POLYGAMY: From the Salt Lake Tribune

The state of Utah promotes responsible procreation and families with one mother and one father--but there is no ban on stepparents playing a role in children's lives and no laws enforced against unmarried teenagers who get pregnant, a civil rights lawyer told a federal judge Tuesday.

Attorney Brian Barnard also pointed out that interracial wedlock once was illegal, but now is lawful. The concept of marriage is changing, he said, and the legal definition should include polygamy.

"The state of Utah should not be able to criminalize the maintenance of an intimate relationship," Barnard argued in a challenge to prohibitions in state law and in the state constitution against bigamy and polygamy.

Assistant Utah Attorney General Jerrold Jensen agreed concepts about wedlock are changing, but added, "The state has always had the authority to regulate marriage."

That authority includes the power to ban incestuous, underage and same-sex marriages, he said.

The lawyers made their arguments to U.S. District Judge Ted Stewart in a hearing on a lawsuit filed by three Utahns who want to live together legally as husband and wife and wife. The trio filed suit in January against Salt Lake County clerks for refusing to issue a marriage license to the man, who already is legally married to one of the women, so he could marry the second woman.

The three contend the ban on plural marriage violates their constitutional rights to practice their religion and to free association. In addition, they say the law unfairly targets religious polygamy because people who create multiple common-law marriages through cohabitation are never prosecuted for bigamy.

At Tuesday's hearing, Barnard asked the judge to find the anti-bigamy and anti-polygamy laws unconstitutional based on a ruling last year by the U.S. Supreme Court. That ruling struck down a Texas law banning sodomy between same-sex couples. In Lawrence v. Texas, the court held that the law violated the privacy rights of consenting adults. ...

He added that a man in Utah could impregnate six girlfriends without facing criminal charges, while another who lives with six wives and takes responsibility for his children could be prosecuted.

more

Share on Facebook! Tweet This! http://www.wikio.com VOTE

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

home | marriagedebate.com | resources | about imapp | contact

Copyright Institute for Marriage and Public Policy