|
|
Friday, October 08, 2004
KAUS, SULLIVAN ON KERRY
Mickey Kaus: ..."The president and I have the same position, fundamentally, on gay marriage. We do. Same position."--John Kerry, in today's NYT Actually, of course, Kerry is trying to pull off a straddle here--he hints to gay rights audiences that he'll support gay marriage down the road. The problem, as with most of Kerry's straddles, is that he doesn't let both sides know both faces of his position. In the above quote, he's trying to con conservatives into thinking--well, that he has the same position as the president. (here; scroll to Oct 7 entries) Andrew Sullivan: ...I should be plain. I have never trusted Kerry on gay civil rights, still don't, and wrote a piece earlier this year for the Advocate, warning gay voters not to trust him. So, yes, Mickey, I am aware of his slippery, unprincipled and vacuous stand on civil rights for gay couples. ... The difference, however, is obvious. Kerry supports civil unions that contain all the rights and responsiblities of civil marriages; Bush doesn't. In fact, Bush has endorsed a federal amendment that would bar both gay marriage and any civil arrangements that, like civil unions or even domestic partnerships, would give gay couples even basic protections. So the difference is stark. And, of course, the constitutional amendment is a HUGE deal. ... I've never regarded support for civil marriage rights a litmus test for supporting a candidate. But elevating this to the level of a completely unnecessary constitutional amendment was a new development, an unprecedented attack on gay citizens, on states' rights and the constitution. Kerry's opposition to such an amendment is a vast and vital distinction. For gay voters, there is therefore no meaningful choice. (more) |
|||||||||
|
home | marriagedebate.com | resources | about imapp | contact |
Post a Comment
<< Home