|
|
Thursday, February 26, 2009
CONTINUING CONVERSATION ON BLANKENHORN/RAUCH EDITORIAL
(and please do send me more links if you have 'em) Barry Deutsch: ...But the compromise doesn’t cede the word “marriage.” Blankenhorn and Rauch aren’t trying to end debate over the word “marriage.” What the B/R compromise (as I shall now call it) attempts to do is put aside two sub-debates associated with marriage, while leaving the primary debate — over formal marriage equality — untouched and ongoing. more Jonathan Rauch on the Andersen/Girgis counterproposal: ...So we'd go from today's world, where one side demands full marriage rights and the other side rejects even minimal recognition of gay couples, to a world where same-sex couples got federal civil unions—which they'd have to share with a few nuns and aging sisters—but gays agreed not to ask for more. States, presumably, could continue to tussle over gay marriage, but the federal debate would be over. more Labels: civil unions, David Blankenhorn, gay marriage, Jonathan Rauch, religious liberty, Ryan T. Anderson, Sherif Girgis |
|||||||||
|
home | marriagedebate.com | resources | about imapp | contact |
<< Home